we are not extreme, but the rhetoric is

July 22, 2010           Author: admin

(from guest blogger Vegina – musings from a feminist vegan rabble rouser…)

Check out this power point from the US State Department’s Overseas Security Advisory Board. (FYI, I covered the faces of all activists since they did not give their consent to be in this slideshow; otherwise it is in the original). This presentation is geared toward corporations that rely on or support animal exploitation.

This power point was first released publicly on GreenIsTheNewRed.com http://www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/state-department-powerpoint-corporations/560/.  Will Potter does an excellent job of covering the important political issues surrounding this issue, so check it out.

The logic and rhetoric demonstrated here is absurd. Be sure to download the slide show and read the “notes” section for the full “WTF” effect.  Some of the most ridiculous parts of this slideshow include a fallacious link between SHAC and the ALF and highlighting the mainstream U.S. Animal Rights conference as a place where “extremists” gather.

And then there is their description of the “extreme” tactics of the animal rights movement:

“Site demonstrations have long been a tactic of extremists. However, mobilizing several hundred supporters is difficult for the extremists. Therefore, their tactics have evolved to include only 6-10 hardcore individuals who rent cars and travel in a pseudo-convoy from one targeted site to the next and on to the next, all in one day. At each stop, they splatter the location with leaflets, bang drums, shout and chant into a bullhorn, and often attempt to intimidate the employees of the company”

Last time I checked, this was called carpooling to a protest.

They call us terrorists. But what is terrorism? Terrorism is valuing artificial borders over life. It is killing civilians in the name of “war.” It is killing anyone in the name of “war.” It is flying planes into buildings, no matter what country the perpetrator is from. Terrorism is using rape as a tool for war. Terrorism is tearing down rainforests, stripping the land of entire species of animals and plant life for the sake of capitalist gain. Terrorism is raping animals, kidnapping and imprisoning their babies just to force them to grow up in overcrowded conditions and have their body parts (like beaks, tails and talons) cut off, only to haul them off to a scary painful slaughter.

Animal rights activists are not terrorists. Terror means fear but we fight for life.

They call us extreme, but what is extreme? Extreme is over 350 animals being slaughtered for food in the United States every single second of every single day. Extreme is the high rate of heart disease in the U.S. Extreme is labeling legal protest activity terrorism. It is allowing a person to die from lack of shelter or healthcare because they are poor or lack the appropriate citizenship status. Extreme is imprisoning people and not charging them with any crimes, then holding them without legal representation.   It is rich pharmaceutical companies refusing to provide HIV medications to AIDS ravaged countries.  It is dairy ads claiming, “milk does a body good,” when it actually leeches calcium from bones. Extreme is the fact that Monsanto was actually allowed to patent and “own” food seeds. Factory farming is extreme. Murdering animals to take their fur is extreme. Beating animals so they will perform “cute” tricks is extreme.

Animal rights activists are not extreme. Rejecting violence is anything but extreme. It is simply logical. Extreme means irrational, but we fight for love and against exploitation; these are the most loving, rational and basic things a person can fight for.

Animal rights activists fight for equality and the right for everyone to live a life free of exploitation and pain. We are not terrorists and we are not extremists. No matter how many times it is said, no matter how many laws are passed, no matter how many activists are imprisoned, we will never be terrorists and we are not extreme. Animal rights activists choose life over death and compassion over violence. Artificial borders, be they between nations or ethnicities or genders or species, are never justification for exploitation or murder. Rejection of these things in favor of life is not terror and it is not extreme, it is simply love.


Comments

4 Comments on we are not extreme, but the rhetoric is

  1. sheree on Fri, 23rd Jul 2010 3:40 pm
  2. The State dept. gave lots of great suggestions for avoiding becoming a target of an ARE…They left out the BEST one…STOP torturing animals!

  3. Judith Shipstad on Fri, 23rd Jul 2010 7:32 pm
  4. I’m afraid I’ve come to detest my own country, civilians and military alike; and even though I oppose the the behaviors that caused these photos to be taken, I worry whether I am tainted by the evil “group karma” that humans seem to be amassing against themselves.

  5. Aouie on Mon, 20th Sep 2010 5:50 am
  6. Extremity is relative and in many cases subjective. Extremism should not be viewed as a bad thing in and of itself. It is a good idea to recheck views that many people consider extreme, and to be wary of how others choose to handle the perceived extremism. Extremism and fundamentalism are often part of conviction. As part of valuing individualism and freedom of thought, we should not go along with the demonization of extremism. But as a society we may have to take related security measures when dealing with some kinds of extreme views, tactics, communications, knowledge, etceteras.

    We should be against isolationism (or any undue barriers to communications), as it results in extremely harmful views (the bad instances of extremism and fundamentalism) not being subject to cross-examination, discussion, etceteras. Unfortunately, some of the views of those who are willing to engage in illegal activities for non-human animals (or other causes), cannot be discussed openly and are hence not subject to sufficient cross-examination, discussion, etceteras. Differing convictions can cause an action to appear good for one person, and bad for another, and as such it is not always a simple matter of right or wrong. (Well-moderated) Forums for anonymous discussions on extreme actions can help minimize the chances of extremely harmful actions that are not likely to advance the interests of the doer of the harmful actions.
    Sincerely,
    Aouie

  7. Emily on Sun, 20th Mar 2011 9:57 pm
  8. I doubt anyone in the world will ever see this comment. If you do, I want to share my story of a man hurting his own cause as an exreemist.
    My parents broke up. They do, it happens. My father found a new family. Vegan/vegetarian, and now he fights for animal rights.I agree, cruelty to animals is wrong. So wrong. However this man pushes these horrific videos and pictures onto a 12/13 year old,who doesnt even oppose his cause. I dont oppose either, however, i received “bold native” for my BIRTHDAY. Call me ungrateful, but i destroyed it. I agree with the cause, but i dont like that type of imagry. Its completley inapropriate for a 12 year old. My situation is hopeless. This man will most likely browbeat us with these things until the day we die, but please mention with video postings how these can be graphic and innapropriate for some children. If you are reading, thank you. I can be contacted at xXFaelineXx@gmail.com for your response, as i may not check here







ENTER EMAIL TO JOIN MAILING LIST